Add your XLIFF file
Drop one or more .xliff files onto the converter above, or browse for them. They load into browser memory only — nothing is uploaded, so there is no size-based pricing and no server queue.
Converting a .xliff font to .pot repackages the same glyphs and metrics for a different delivery target. Free, private, and validated — the file never leaves your browser.
Batch files can each use a different output. Nothing uploads for local conversions.
Working inputs include camera RAW, browser-local audio/video, PDF, CBZ/CBR comics, office documents, ebooks, markup, 3D models, structured text, images, and archives.Converting a .xliff font to .pot repackages the same glyphs and metrics for a different delivery target. A .xliff file is an XLIFF document written with the long extension, most often at version 2.0 — the redesigned OASIS standard in which each translatable string is a unit containing one or more segments, each with its own source and target. The payload matches the .xlf form; the structure is what changed.
A .pot file is a gettext Portable Object Template: the same grammar as a .po file, but with every msgstr deliberately empty. It is the extraction output — the list of every translatable string found in a codebase — from which each language's .po file is created and later merged. For this route the practical draw is one canonical source of truth for what is translatable and carries source references, so a string can be traced back to the line that produced it — balanced against contains no translations, so it is easy to mistake an empty catalog for a broken one, which is worth knowing before you commit a large batch.
The practical trigger for this conversion is usually a mismatch: with .xliff, less widely supported than 1.2 despite being the newer standard. Switching to .pot buys you one canonical source of truth for what is translatable, which is why it is the better fit for handing a complete string inventory to translators or a translation vendor. Because the conversion runs locally, trying it costs nothing but a few seconds of compute on your own machine.
| Aspect | XLIFF 2.0 (.xliff) | GNU gettext template (.pot) |
|---|---|---|
| Format type | Text-based — characters and structure, so there is no visual quality loss | Text-based — characters and structure, so there is no visual quality loss |
| How it stores data | the root xliff element carries srcLang and trgLang, replacing 1.2's source-language and target-language on file | syntactically identical to .po; the difference is semantic — msgstr values are empty by definition |
| Strongest at | interchange with tooling built against the 2.0 core | handing a complete string inventory to translators or a translation vendor |
| Weak spot | less widely supported than 1.2 despite being the newer standard | contains no translations, so it is easy to mistake an empty catalog for a broken one |
| Metadata | unit identifiers, source and target text and the declared languages are preserved. Module data — change tracking, glossary entries, translation candidates — and inline markup are not represented in flat key-value targets | identifiers, source strings and context survive. Empty targets are preserved as empty rather than being filled from the source. Header placeholders and source references are not carried into formats with no equivalent field |
Drop one or more .xliff files onto the converter above, or browse for them. They load into browser memory only — nothing is uploaded, so there is no size-based pricing and no server queue.
Select .pot in the output menu next to each file. The menu only offers targets this engine can genuinely produce, so if POT is selectable, the route is real and validated.
Press Convert. The font tables are parsed and rewritten locally with fonteditor-core; glyph outlines, hinting, and kerning survive the trip.
Each result is signature-checked before the download unlocks, so a failed encode can never masquerade as a valid POT file. Outputs keep the original filename with the .pot extension.
There is no visual quality to lose — xliff is text-oriented and pot is text-oriented, so the question is structural fidelity. Text, ordering, and basic structure are preserved; complex layout, embedded objects, and styling beyond the target's model are simplified.
Yes — the .xliff file is processed inside your browser tab and never uploaded. The font tables are parsed and rewritten locally with fonteditor-core; glyph outlines, hinting, and kerning survive the trip. Close the tab and the file is gone from memory.
Any tool that reads .po reads .pot, since the grammar is the same. Novus Convert converts templates to and from the other localization formats and preserves the empty-target semantics — a template converted to XLIFF arrives with empty targets rather than targets echoing the source, which is what makes it still usable as a template.
It depends on the content: syntactically identical to .po; the difference is semantic — msgstr values are empty by definition. Convert one representative file first and compare before batch-processing a large set.
In .xliff, unit identifiers, source and target text and the declared languages are preserved. Module data — change tracking, glossary entries, translation candidates — and inline markup are not represented in flat key-value targets. Re-encoding through the browser pipeline does not carry embedded metadata into the output, which doubles as a privacy scrub — check the exported file if you specifically need tags preserved.
Yes — the reverse route exists as a separate tool. Bear in mind that round-tripping .xliff → .pot → .xliff is not a perfect undo when any lossy step is involved; keep your original if fidelity matters.