Verified local conversion

POT to XLIFF

Converting a .pot font to .xliff repackages the same glyphs and metrics for a different delivery target. Free, private, and validated — the file never leaves your browser.

Private for supported formats — processed in your browser

Convert supported files

Runs on your device

Drop POT files here

Batch files can each use a different output. Nothing uploads for local conversions.

Working inputs include camera RAW, browser-local audio/video, PDF, CBZ/CBR comics, office documents, ebooks, markup, 3D models, structured text, images, and archives.

About converting GNU gettext template to XLIFF 2.0

Converting a .pot font to .xliff repackages the same glyphs and metrics for a different delivery target. A .pot file is a gettext Portable Object Template: the same grammar as a .po file, but with every msgstr deliberately empty. It is the extraction output — the list of every translatable string found in a codebase — from which each language's .po file is created and later merged.

A .xliff file is an XLIFF document written with the long extension, most often at version 2.0 — the redesigned OASIS standard in which each translatable string is a unit containing one or more segments, each with its own source and target. The payload matches the .xlf form; the structure is what changed. For this route the practical draw is a much cleaner specification than 1.2, with a genuinely small mandatory core and modules make optional capability explicit instead of implied — balanced against less widely supported than 1.2 despite being the newer standard, which is worth knowing before you commit a large batch.

Why convert POT to XLIFF?

The practical trigger for this conversion is usually a mismatch: with .pot, contains no translations, so it is easy to mistake an empty catalog for a broken one. Switching to .xliff buys you a much cleaner specification than 1.2, with a genuinely small mandatory core, which is why it is the better fit for interchange with tooling built against the 2.0 core. Because the conversion runs locally, trying it costs nothing but a few seconds of compute on your own machine.

POT vs XLIFF at a glance

AspectGNU gettext template (.pot)XLIFF 2.0 (.xliff)
Format typeText-based — characters and structure, so there is no visual quality lossText-based — characters and structure, so there is no visual quality loss
How it stores datasyntactically identical to .po; the difference is semantic — msgstr values are empty by definitionthe root xliff element carries srcLang and trgLang, replacing 1.2's source-language and target-language on file
Strongest athanding a complete string inventory to translators or a translation vendorinterchange with tooling built against the 2.0 core
Weak spotcontains no translations, so it is easy to mistake an empty catalog for a broken oneless widely supported than 1.2 despite being the newer standard
Metadataidentifiers, source strings and context survive. Empty targets are preserved as empty rather than being filled from the source. Header placeholders and source references are not carried into formats with no equivalent fieldunit identifiers, source and target text and the declared languages are preserved. Module data — change tracking, glossary entries, translation candidates — and inline markup are not represented in flat key-value targets
01

Add your POT file

Drop one or more .pot files onto the converter above, or browse for them. They load into browser memory only — nothing is uploaded, so there is no size-based pricing and no server queue.

02

Pick XLIFF as the output

Select .xliff in the output menu next to each file. The menu only offers targets this engine can genuinely produce, so if XLIFF is selectable, the route is real and validated.

03

Convert on your device

Press Convert. The font tables are parsed and rewritten locally with fonteditor-core; glyph outlines, hinting, and kerning survive the trip.

04

Verify and download

Each result is signature-checked before the download unlocks, so a failed encode can never masquerade as a valid XLIFF file. Outputs keep the original filename with the .xliff extension.

POT to XLIFF questions, answered

Will converting POT to XLIFF lose quality?

There is no visual quality to lose — pot is text-oriented and xliff is text-oriented, so the question is structural fidelity. Text, ordering, and basic structure are preserved; complex layout, embedded objects, and styling beyond the target's model are simplified.

Is it private to convert POT files here?

Yes — the .pot file is processed inside your browser tab and never uploaded. The font tables are parsed and rewritten locally with fonteditor-core; glyph outlines, hinting, and kerning survive the trip. Close the tab and the file is gone from memory.

Where will the XLIFF file work?

Support is good in modern translation management systems and patchier in older desktop tools, so 1.2 remains the safer choice when a recipient's capabilities are unknown. Novus Convert parses 2.0 units and segments alongside 1.2 trans-units, refuses documents with a doctype or custom entities, and converts locally to the other nine localization formats.

Will the XLIFF file be bigger or smaller than my POT?

It depends on the content: the root xliff element carries srcLang and trgLang, replacing 1.2's source-language and target-language on file. Convert one representative file first and compare before batch-processing a large set.

What happens to the metadata in my POT file?

In .pot, identifiers, source strings and context survive. Empty targets are preserved as empty rather than being filled from the source. Header placeholders and source references are not carried into formats with no equivalent field. Re-encoding through the browser pipeline does not carry embedded metadata into the output, which doubles as a privacy scrub — check the exported file if you specifically need tags preserved.

Can I convert XLIFF back to POT?

Yes — the reverse route exists as a separate tool. Bear in mind that round-tripping .pot → .xliff → .pot is not a perfect undo when any lossy step is involved; keep your original if fidelity matters.