Verified local conversion

RESX to STRINGS

Converting a .resx font to .strings repackages the same glyphs and metrics for a different delivery target. Free, private, and validated — the file never leaves your browser.

Private for supported formats — processed in your browser

Convert supported files

Runs on your device

Drop RESX files here

Batch files can each use a different output. Nothing uploads for local conversions.

Working inputs include camera RAW, browser-local audio/video, PDF, CBZ/CBR comics, office documents, ebooks, markup, 3D models, structured text, images, and archives.

About converting .NET RESX resources to Apple strings localization

Converting a .resx font to .strings repackages the same glyphs and metrics for a different delivery target. A .resx file is a .NET XML resource file: a list of named data elements, each holding a value and an optional comment, used for the translatable strings and embedded assets of a .NET application. Visual Studio compiles it into a binary .resources file that is embedded in the assembly.

A .strings file is Apple's localization resource: a flat list of "key" = "value"; statements, one per translatable string, usually named Localizable.strings and stored inside a per-language .lproj directory. It is what NSLocalizedString and its SwiftUI equivalents look up at runtime. For this route the practical draw is trivially simple grammar that any tool can read or write and native to Apple's toolchain with no build step beyond copying — balanced against no plural support at all — that requires a second file in a different format, which is worth knowing before you commit a large batch.

Why convert RESX to STRINGS?

The practical trigger for this conversion is usually a mismatch: with .resx, extremely verbose — the schema preamble often outweighs the content. Switching to .strings buys you trivially simple grammar that any tool can read or write, which is why it is the better fit for localising an existing iOS, iPadOS or macOS application. Because the conversion runs locally, trying it costs nothing but a few seconds of compute on your own machine.

RESX vs STRINGS at a glance

Aspect.NET RESX resources (.resx)Apple strings localization (.strings)
Format typeText-based — characters and structure, so there is no visual quality lossText-based — characters and structure, so there is no visual quality loss
How it stores datathe document root is a plain <root> element; each entry is a <data name=…> containing <value> and optionally <comment>each entry is `"key" = "value";` — the trailing semicolon is required, and both sides use C-style escapes
Strongest atlocalising a WinForms, WPF, ASP.NET or MAUI applicationlocalising an existing iOS, iPadOS or macOS application
Weak spotextremely verbose — the schema preamble often outweighs the contentno plural support at all — that requires a second file in a different format
Metadataentry names, values and comments are preserved. The schema preamble, resheader declarations and base64 binary resources are not represented in string-catalog targets, and the culture — which lives in the filename — is not part of the document at allkeys and translated values are preserved. Comments are not treated as structured notes, and plural rules cannot be represented — a catalog with plurals converted into .strings will lose the plural forms because the format has no way to hold them
01

Add your RESX file

Drop one or more .resx files onto the converter above, or browse for them. They load into browser memory only — nothing is uploaded, so there is no size-based pricing and no server queue.

02

Pick STRINGS as the output

Select .strings in the output menu next to each file. The menu only offers targets this engine can genuinely produce, so if STRINGS is selectable, the route is real and validated.

03

Convert on your device

Press Convert. The font tables are parsed and rewritten locally with fonteditor-core; glyph outlines, hinting, and kerning survive the trip.

04

Verify and download

Each result is signature-checked before the download unlocks, so a failed encode can never masquerade as a valid STRINGS file. Outputs keep the original filename with the .strings extension.

RESX to STRINGS questions, answered

Will converting RESX to STRINGS lose quality?

There is no visual quality to lose — resx is text-oriented and strings is text-oriented, so the question is structural fidelity. Text, ordering, and basic structure are preserved; complex layout, embedded objects, and styling beyond the target's model are simplified.

Is it private to convert RESX files here?

Yes — the .resx file is processed inside your browser tab and never uploaded. The font tables are parsed and rewritten locally with fonteditor-core; glyph outlines, hinting, and kerning survive the trip. Close the tab and the file is gone from memory.

Where will the STRINGS file work?

Xcode reads and writes .strings natively, and every translation platform supports it because iOS work demands it. Outside Apple's ecosystem support is incidental. Novus Convert parses the quoted key/value grammar locally, tolerating the comment form, and converts to and from the other localization formats.

Will the STRINGS file be bigger or smaller than my RESX?

It depends on the content: each entry is `"key" = "value";` — the trailing semicolon is required, and both sides use C-style escapes. Convert one representative file first and compare before batch-processing a large set.

What happens to the metadata in my RESX file?

In .resx, entry names, values and comments are preserved. The schema preamble, resheader declarations and base64 binary resources are not represented in string-catalog targets, and the culture — which lives in the filename — is not part of the document at all. Re-encoding through the browser pipeline does not carry embedded metadata into the output, which doubles as a privacy scrub — check the exported file if you specifically need tags preserved.

Can I convert STRINGS back to RESX?

Yes — the reverse route exists as a separate tool. Bear in mind that round-tripping .resx → .strings → .resx is not a perfect undo when any lossy step is involved; keep your original if fidelity matters.